Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’accès aux dossiers médicaux des patientes et des patients du Programme de santé mentale de l’Hôpital Montfort (1976-2006), accordé par le Bureau éthique de la recherche de cet hôpital et celui de l’Université d’Ottawa, a permis de découvrir des sources qui dévoilent les mots, les gestes et les silences de femmes souffrant d’un trouble psychique grave. Nous nous sommes spécifiquement intéressées aux dires et aux écrits des mères diagnostiquées schizophrènes ayant perdu la garde légale de leur enfant et constaté que le thème de l’enfant revient de façon récurrente dans les entretiens entre soignant-soigné. L’approche micro-historienne privilégiée est nourrie des travaux de Paul Ricœur et de Rita Charon, précisément, sur le rôle des professionnels de la santé quant à leur sensibilité à capter les histoires de leurs patients. Le résultat de nos analyses est présenté sous la forme d’un construit narratif qui rend compte du double traumatisme que peut vivre une femme schizophrène.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.077 | 0.012 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".