MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3192430626 · doi:10.1088/1402-4896/ac1ccf

A robust numerical approximation of advection diffusion equations with nonsingular kernel derivative

2021· article· en· W3192430626 on OpenAlexaff
Kamran Kamran, Ali Ahmadian, Soheil Salahshour, Mehdi Salimi

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysica Scripta · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicFractional Differential Equations Solutions
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversitySt. Francis Xavier University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInvertible matrixAdvectionKernel (algebra)Applied mathematicsDiffusionDerivative (finance)MathematicsMathematical analysisPhysicsPure mathematicsThermodynamicsEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In this article we aim to approximate linear time fractional advection diffusion equations (TFADE) with Atangana-Baleanu- Caputo(ABC) derivative using local meshless method and Laplace transformation(LT). The method comprises of three steps. In the first step the the time variable is eliminated using LT. In the second step the reduced problem is solved using local meshless method. In the third step the solution of TFADE with ABC derivative is retrieved from local meshless methods solution by representing it as Bromwich integral. We then approximate the integral using some suitable quadrature rule. The stability and convergence of the method are discussed. The local meshless method is utilized to overcome the ill-conditioning issue of the interpolation matrices in global meshless methods and to over come the shape parameters sensitivity. Also in comparison with time stepping methods the LT is employed and contour integration technique is utilized to deal with the ABC derivative, which circumvent the calculation of costly convolution integrals in the approximation of ABC derivative, and also avoids the effect of time step on the stability and accuracy. Some test problems are considered in one and two dimensions to validate the proposed numerical method. The two dimensional problem is solved in regular and irregular domains. The computational experiments confirms that this method is computationally efficient and highly accurate for such type of problems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.077
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysica ScriptaSame topicFractional Differential Equations SolutionsFrench-language works237,207