MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3192529110 · doi:10.5564/jis.v0i0.1667

Вопросы Российско-Монгольских отношений в начале XX века (1900-1921 гг): экономика, дипломатия, культура

2013· article· ru· W3192529110 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Суходолов А.П, Б Болдбаатар, Кузьмин Ю.В, Д Шүрхүү

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of International Studies · 2013
Typearticle
Languageru
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicRangeland Management and Livestock Ecology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiplomacyHistoriographyQuarter (Canadian coin)State (computer science)Political scienceHistoryAncient historyEconomic historyPoliticsLawArchaeologyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

В статье показано развитие русско-монгольских отношений в первой четверти XX века, становление монгольского национального государства и роль России; представлена современная характеристика исследований данной проблемы в российской и монгольской историографии. Questions of Russian-Mongolian Relations in the Beginning of 20th century (1900-1921): Economics, Diplomacy and Culture The development of Russian-Mongolian relations in the first quarter of XX century, formation of the Mongolian national state ant the role of Russia in this process are mentioned in this article; the modern characteristic of researches of these problems in Russian and Mongolian historiography is also presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.058

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of International StudiesSame topicRangeland Management and Livestock EcologyFrench-language works237,207