MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3192562887 · doi:10.1503/cjs.015021

Editorial-Impact de la lourdeur des lourdes tâches administratives sur les soins aux patients et la satisfaction des chirurgiens

2021· editorial· fr· W3192562887 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Chad G. Ball, Paul B. McBeth

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Surgery · 2021
Typeeditorial
Languagefr
FieldMedicine
TopicDigital Imaging in Medicine
Canadian institutionsCanadian Journal of Communication (Canada)Calgary Laboratory ServicesUniversity of CalgaryAlberta Health Services
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

On peut définir les tâches administratives comme un « travail routinier impliquant des documents écrits, tels que formulaires, dossiers ou lettres ». Il est indéniable qu’une documentation adéquate (en version papier et/ou électronique) est cruciale pour la sécurité des patients, la

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.067
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.073
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.067
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.003
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of SurgerySame topicDigital Imaging in MedicineFrench-language works237,207