MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3192563687 · doi:10.1016/j.hrcr.2021.07.011

Epicardial substrate ablation in early repolarization syndrome patient with recurrent ventricular fibrillation

2021· article· en· W3192563687 on OpenAlexaff
Jasmine Bisson, Melvin M. Scheinman, Alexios Hadjis

Bibliographic record

VenueHeartRhythm Case Reports · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalHôpital du Sacré-Cœur de Montréal
FundersBiosense WebsterMedtronic
KeywordsMedicineCardiologyInternal medicineVentricular fibrillationAblationBrugada syndromeAtrial fibrillation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

When faced with a patient surviving sudden cardiac death (SCD) following ventricular fibrillation (VF), the cardiac electrophysiologist is tasked with searching for an identifiable cause of the arrhythmia, whether it be structural, electrical, or genetic. Identifying a clear cause not only establishes a diagnosis but permits tailored patient counseling and management. Furthermore, the identification of modifiable or reversible elements may improve prognosis if properly addressed. In the most challenging cases, exhaustive and careful investigations offer no explanation and the patient is diagnosed with idiopathic VF.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.184
Threshold uncertainty score0.594

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHeartRhythm Case ReportsSame topicCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmiasFrench-language works237,207