MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3192628405 · doi:10.51201/jusst/21/07285

Some Recent Developments in theory of Metric Spaces

2021· article· en· W3192628405 on OpenAlexaff
Parveen Sheoran

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of University of Shanghai for Science and Technology · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDigital Image Processing Techniques
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTopology (electrical circuits)Metric spaceMathematicsMetric (unit)Space (punctuation)Set (abstract data type)Topological spaceFunction (biology)Hausdorff spaceComputer sciencePure mathematicsCombinatorics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The topology on a set X is formed by a non-negative real valued scalar function called metric, which may be understood as measuring some quantity. Because some of the set’s attributes are similar, there’s a distance between any two elements, or points. Quite evocative of the common concept of distance that we come across in our daily lives. Because its topology is entirely defined by a scalar distance function, this sort of topological space has a distinct advantage over all others. We may reasonably assume that we are familiar with the qualities of such a function and are capable of dealing with it successfully. Instead, a generic topology is frequently dictated by a set of perhaps abstract rules. Frecklet initially proposed the concept of a metric space in 1906, but it was Hausdorff who coined the phrase metric space a few years later.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.031

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0040.006
Science and technology studies0.0020.007
Scholarly communication0.0060.011
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0030.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of University of Shanghai for Science and TechnologySame topicDigital Image Processing TechniquesFrench-language works237,207