MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3192711635 · doi:10.1093/jsh/shab030

<i>A History of the Republic of Biafra: Law, Crime, and the Nigerian Civil War</i>. By Samuel Fury Childs Daly

2021· article· en· W3192711635 on OpenAlexaff
Meredith Terretta

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Social History · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical and Contemporary Political Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpanish Civil WarContext (archaeology)Argument (complex analysis)State (computer science)LawNigeriansMemoirThe RepublicPolitical scienceSociologyHistoryEconomic historyTheology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As I read this book on the Biafran War and its aftermath, the COVID-19 pandemic disrupted rights and mobility everywhere to varying degree, ushering in a state of prolonged uncertainty across the world. This present-day backdrop made it easier to imagine the cumulative and increasingly grave effects of the changes to daily life that war ushered in to 1970s Nigeria following the Republic of Biafra’s brief existence. Daly’s central argument is that “It is impossible to understand Nigeria’s long experience of crime without the context of the Nigerian Civil War—specifically, the survival tactics that Biafrans and Nigerians developed to cope with wartime dangers and postwar hardships” (13). Criminality is not inherent to Nigeria as popular and scholarly portrayals too often suggest. Rather, it is contingent, arising from the war and its aftermath. Using evidence gathered from incomplete court records, memoirs and supplemented with some thirty oral interviews (2, 23-6), Daly...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.040
Threshold uncertainty score0.079

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0130.007
Scholarly communication0.0070.006
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.184
Teacher spread0.166 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Social HistorySame topicHistorical and Contemporary Political DynamicsFrench-language works237,207