MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3192792219 · doi:10.7202/1078679ar

Qu’est-ce qui est allemand ? Les définitions de l’identité allemande en Pologne et Tchécoslovaquie, 1945−1948

2020· article· fr· W3192792219 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Florence L’Abbé

Bibliographic record

VenueCahiers d histoire · 2020
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicFrench Historical and Cultural Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lors de la Deuxième Guerre mondiale, les gouvernements polonais et tchécoslovaque en exil demandent l’appui des Alliés pour expulser les minorités allemandes de leurs pays. Une fois de retour dans leurs pays, les gouvernements ne perdent pas de temps et mettent leur plan à exécution. Or, rapidement, les pays expulseurs constatent non seulement l’ampleur de la tâche, mais aussi l’incohérence des définitions de l’identité allemande selon les réalités régionales et locales. Cet article vise d’une part à dégager les tentatives des autorités d’établir, de propager et d’uniformiser les « normes » de germanité (ce qui les transforment plutôt en « définitions » puisqu’elles changent constamment), puis d’autre part, à dresser le bilan de l’instrumentalisation de ces définitions par les gouvernements polonais et tchécoslovaque afin de légitimer leur pouvoir et de conserver leur territoire.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.384
Threshold uncertainty score0.763

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0080.026
Scholarly communication0.0060.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCahiers d histoireSame topicFrench Historical and Cultural StudiesFrench-language works237,207