MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3192996299 · doi:10.7939/dvn/fsrceu

Protocol for systematic reviews on risk factors and preventive interventions for post Covid-19 condition

2021· dataset· en· W3192996299 on OpenAlexaffabout
Jennifer Pillay

Bibliographic record

VenueBorealis · 2021
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLong-Term Effects of COVID-19
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProtocol (science)Agency (philosophy)Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Psychological interventionSystematic reviewPublic healthEnvironmental healthMedicineMEDLINEAlternative medicinePolitical scienceNursingDiseaseSociologyPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This is a protocol for systematic reviews on risk factors and preventive interventions for post Covid-19 condition, conducted in collaboration with the Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC) and the Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (CADTH)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.035
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.133
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Protocol · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.351
Threshold uncertainty score0.926

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0350.133
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0060.009
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0160.017
Bibliometrics0.0150.022
Science and technology studies0.0050.004
Scholarly communication0.0100.006
Open science0.0060.009
Research integrity0.0070.009
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.3510.038

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.072
GPT teacher head0.439
Teacher spread0.367 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreProtocol

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBorealis→Same topicLong-Term Effects of COVID-19→French-language works237,207→