A Federated Learning Based Privacy-Preserving Smart Healthcare System
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The rapid development of the smart healthcare system makes the early-stage detection of dementia disease more user-friendly and affordable. However, the main concern is the potential serious privacy leakage of the system. In this article, we take Alzheimer's disease (AD) as an example and design a convenient and privacy-preserving system namedADDetectorwith the assistance of Internet of Things (IoT) devices and security mechanisms. Particularly, to achieve effective AD detection,ADDetectoronly collects user's audio by IoT devices widely deployed in the smart home environment and utilizes novel topic-based linguistic features to improve the detection accuracy. For the privacy breach existing in data, feature, and model levels,ADDetectorachieves privacy-preserving by employing a unique three-layer (i.e., user, client, cloud, etc.) architecture. Moreover,ADDetectorexploitsfederated learning (FL) based schemeto ensure the user owns the integrity of raw data and secure the confidentiality of the classification model and implementdifferential privacy (DP) mechanismto enhance the privacy level of the feature. Furthermore, to secure the model aggregation process between clients and cloud in FL-based scheme, a novelasynchronous privacy-preserving aggregation frameworkis designed. We evaluateADDetectoron 1010 AD detection trials from 99 health and AD users. The experimental results show thatADDetectorachieves high accuracy of 81.9% and low time overhead of 0.7 s when implementing all privacy-preserving mechanisms (i.e., FL, DP, and cryptography-based aggregation).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".