Global finite‐time cooperative control for multiple manipulators using integral sliding mode control
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract In this paper, a global finite‐time cooperative control is first time proposed for cooperative multiple manipulators. The proposed control scheme is developed based on an integration between a finite‐time disturbance observer (FTDO) and a finite‐time integral sliding mode controller (FTISMC) to get a high robustness against the effects of the model uncertainties and disturbances in the system. The switching term of the integral sliding mode controller is reconstructed such that the desired sliding manifold can be convergent in a finite time. The nominal controller of the integral sliding mode control is developed based on an advanced backstepping control, namely, finite‐time backstepping control, which also provides a finite time convergence. The integration of the finite‐time disturbance observer, finite‐time switching term, and the finite‐time backstepping controller forms a new global finite‐time integral sliding mode control. The effectiveness of the proposed approach is demonstrated based on a cooperative control of a dual two‐link manipulators.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it