Hinchas organizados: ¿barras bravas o barristas sociales? Una mirada desde Colombia y Ecuador
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Si bien muchos de los hinchas de fútbol han sido categorizados en la región como ‘barras bravas’, sobre todo por la permanente estigmatización como sujetos violentos movidos por la pasión, el artículo se sumerge en el análisis del denominado ‘barrismo social’. Por este término se entiende aquellas actividades y acciones que realizan los hinchas organizados que sobrepasan el campo deportivo y se introducen en temas de apoyo, lucha y ayuda en los ámbitos sociales (barrial, comunitario, societal) o político. A partir del análisis con hinchas de Colombia y Ecuador el estudio da cuenta de nuevas sociabilidades públicas urbanas (más consolidadas en el primer país) que ha permitido una auto reflexión de su tejido organizacional e identitario que permite ver a las hinchadas no solo como sujetos políticos, sino como nacientes movimientos sociales.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".