Hinchas organizados: ¿barras bravas o barristas sociales? Una mirada desde Colombia y Ecuador
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Si bien muchos de los hinchas de fútbol han sido categorizados en la región como ‘barras bravas’, sobre todo por la permanente estigmatización como sujetos violentos movidos por la pasión, el artículo se sumerge en el análisis del denominado ‘barrismo social’. Por este término se entiende aquellas actividades y acciones que realizan los hinchas organizados que sobrepasan el campo deportivo y se introducen en temas de apoyo, lucha y ayuda en los ámbitos sociales (barrial, comunitario, societal) o político. A partir del análisis con hinchas de Colombia y Ecuador el estudio da cuenta de nuevas sociabilidades públicas urbanas (más consolidadas en el primer país) que ha permitido una auto reflexión de su tejido organizacional e identitario que permite ver a las hinchadas no solo como sujetos políticos, sino como nacientes movimientos sociales.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it