MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3193463270 · doi:10.17561/ree.n1.2021.6260

eficacia de los derechos humanos a través del enfoque de la economía social y solidaria

2021· article· es· W3193463270 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista de estudios empresariales · 2021
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEconomic and Social Development
Canadian institutionsComputer Research Institute of Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Analizar la relación entre la concepción de los derechos humanos y la llamada “otra forma de hacer economía” permite avizorar una perspectiva fundamental de la economía social y solidaria, la cual cobra cada vez más relevancia en contextos de crisis como el actual derivado de la pandemia por COVID-19 y en países con ordenamientos jurídicos en los cuales los derechos humanos son el eje central de todo su sistema; una particularidad cada vez más presente en diferentes naciones, sobre todo cuando la satisfacción de varios de estos derechos sigue siendo una tarea pendiente e incompatible, aparentemente, con el sistema económico hegemónico. Esta investigación demuestra cómo prácticas exitosas de Economía Social y Solidaria conllevan una salvaguarda de derechos humanos y fomentan el desarrollo humano local a partir de un factor de inclusión e integración social propio de los valores y principios de la Economía Social y Solidaria.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.788
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it