MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3193594188 · doi:10.1002/rnc.5752

Fault‐tolerant control design for a class of nonlinear systems with actuator malfunctions

2021· article· en· W3193594188 on OpenAlexaff
Kexin Guo, Shangke Lyu, Xiang Yu, Jianzhong Qiao, Lei Guo, Youmin Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFault Detection and Control Systems
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaNatural Science Foundation of Zhejiang ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Nonlinear systemActuatorFeed forwardFault toleranceComputer scienceScheme (mathematics)Control engineeringControl (management)EngineeringMathematicsArtificial intelligenceDistributed computing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This article presents a single‐hidden‐layer feedforward network (SLFN) aided fault‐tolerant control (FTC) scheme for a class of nonlinear systems subject to actuator faults. First, the upper bounds of the norms of the unknown functions, which cover information of actuator faults and amplitude saturation degrees, are deployed. The upper bounds are approximated by SLFNs with adaptive techniques. Subsequently, a sliding mode control approach is presented to allow for prompt corrective reactions, with explicit consideration of multivariable conditions and control input constraints. Finally, simulation results based on a nonlinear Boeing 747 aircraft model are presented to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed FTC scheme.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Robust and Nonlinear ControlSame topicFault Detection and Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207