Design guidance for protection of geomembrane liners in landfill applications
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A new method of evaluating strains and predicting required protection layers that are placed over geomembranes is developed based on the combined effects of the clay strength and stiffness and the cushioning effect of a nonwoven protection layer. Plots giving the required geotextile protection for different maximum strains are presented for expected landfill pressures under 300 kPa for angular, 38 mm gravel placed above a geomembrane liner for both drained and undrained loading conditions of the clay. A similar plot is also given for tire-derived aggregate placed above the liner for pressures under 500 kPa for undrained loading conditions. All tests were conducted at room temperature. For all cases, nonwoven geosynthetic protection layers with mass per unit area (MUA) exceeding at least 1200 g/m2 were required to limit long-term strains below current threshold levels. The MUA of the protection layer, for the particular aggregates and geomembranes tested, is dependent on the loading rate, water content relative to optimum, the silt content, and the activity of the clay below.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".