MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3193635273 · doi:10.25148/etd.fidc009203

A Multimodal Neuroimaging Approach for Classification and Prediction of Alzheimer's Disease Using Machine Learning

2020· dissertation· en· W3193635273 on OpenAlexafffund
Parisa Forouzannezhad

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Canadian institutionsNeuroRx Research (Canada)
FundersNational Institute of Biomedical Imaging and BioengineeringNational Institutes of HealthServierEisaiU.S. Department of DefenseAlzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging InitiativeNorthern California Institute for Research and EducationF. Hoffmann-La RocheUniversity of Southern CaliforniaBiogenEli Lilly and CompanyBristol-Myers SquibbFoundation for the National Institutes of HealthNational Institute on AgingAlzheimer's AssociationCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNational Science Foundation
KeywordsMachine learningArtificial intelligenceDementiaSupport vector machineNeuroimagingFeature selectionDiseaseCognitive declinePopulationComputer sciencePositron emission tomographyDeep learningMedicinePsychologyPathologyNeuroscience

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is one of the most common neurodegenerative disorders among the elderly population. It is progressive, irreversible in nature, and is considered the main cause of dementia. AD has become a world health problem affecting developed and developing nations alike, with the number of diagnosed AD patients increasing rather dramatically as both the life span of humans and the earth’s population continue to increase. Therefore, AD diagnosis in its earliest manifestations, preferably at the presymptomatic stage is critical for the timely planning of treatment and therapeutic interventions. We introduce new machine learning algorithms to detect and predict Alzheimer’s disease in the early phase to include the presymptomatic stage where no manifestation of cognitive decline is yet apparent. An investigation is carried out in search of optimal feature selection methods on different machine learning platforms with the intent to address the challenging classification and regression analysis. This research endeavor introduces three machine learning platforms that are based on (1) deep neural network, (2) support vector machine (SVM), and (3) Gaussian-based model classifiers all optimized in order to delineate the different stages of the disease as well as a regression framework to predict future cognitive scores as means to gauge disease progression, which could play an important role in pre-and post-treatment evaluations. The input data to these machine learning architectures included magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), positron emission tomography (PET), the metabolic fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-PET, cognitive scores, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), and the apolipoprotein E4 (APOE4) gene. An investigation is carried out on the transition phases of AD through regression analysis by predicting cognitive tests including Alzheimer’s disease assessment scale cognitive subscale (ADAS-Cog), Mini-mental state examination (MMSE), and Rey’s auditory verbal learning (RAVLT) that have been designed and used as important criteria to evaluate cognitive status of AD patients. We formulated the prediction of disease progression as a multimodal multitask regression problem across six time points in a 4-year longitudinal study. Major findings of this work reveal that for binary classification, the highest accuracy of 84% for delineating the challenging group of early mild cognitively impaired individuals (EMCI) from the cognitively normal (CN) group is obtained. With multiclass classification using deep neural network methodology, especially when early and late MCI (EMCI and LMCI) groups are included, the accuracy does not exceed 70%, which clearly explains the many nuances in the transition phases of the disease, especially in the early stages. Moreover, the episodic

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.348
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research→French-language works237,207→