A Multimodal Neuroimaging Approach for Classification and Prediction of Alzheimer's Disease Using Machine Learning
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is one of the most common neurodegenerative disorders among the elderly population. It is progressive, irreversible in nature, and is considered the main cause of dementia. AD has become a world health problem affecting developed and developing nations alike, with the number of diagnosed AD patients increasing rather dramatically as both the life span of humans and the earth’s population continue to increase. Therefore, AD diagnosis in its earliest manifestations, preferably at the presymptomatic stage is critical for the timely planning of treatment and therapeutic interventions. We introduce new machine learning algorithms to detect and predict Alzheimer’s disease in the early phase to include the presymptomatic stage where no manifestation of cognitive decline is yet apparent. An investigation is carried out in search of optimal feature selection methods on different machine learning platforms with the intent to address the challenging classification and regression analysis. This research endeavor introduces three machine learning platforms that are based on (1) deep neural network, (2) support vector machine (SVM), and (3) Gaussian-based model classifiers all optimized in order to delineate the different stages of the disease as well as a regression framework to predict future cognitive scores as means to gauge disease progression, which could play an important role in pre-and post-treatment evaluations. The input data to these machine learning architectures included magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), positron emission tomography (PET), the metabolic fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-PET, cognitive scores, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), and the apolipoprotein E4 (APOE4) gene. An investigation is carried out on the transition phases of AD through regression analysis by predicting cognitive tests including Alzheimer’s disease assessment scale cognitive subscale (ADAS-Cog), Mini-mental state examination (MMSE), and Rey’s auditory verbal learning (RAVLT) that have been designed and used as important criteria to evaluate cognitive status of AD patients. We formulated the prediction of disease progression as a multimodal multitask regression problem across six time points in a 4-year longitudinal study. Major findings of this work reveal that for binary classification, the highest accuracy of 84% for delineating the challenging group of early mild cognitively impaired individuals (EMCI) from the cognitively normal (CN) group is obtained. With multiclass classification using deep neural network methodology, especially when early and late MCI (EMCI and LMCI) groups are included, the accuracy does not exceed 70%, which clearly explains the many nuances in the transition phases of the disease, especially in the early stages. Moreover, the episodic
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".