MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3193660838

ҚАЗАҚТАРДЫҢ ХІХ ҒАСЫРДЫҢ 20 ЖЫЛДАРЫНДАҒЫ ИМПЕРИЯЛЫҚ БАСҚАРУ РЕФОРМАЛАРЫНА ҚАРСЫ ҚАРУЛЫ КҮРЕСІ СОЛ МЕРЗІМДЕГІ РЕСЕЙЛІК МЕМЛЕКЕТТІК МҰРАҒАТТАРЫ ДЕРЕКТЕРІНДЕ

2020· article· kk· W3193660838 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ғани Карасаев

Bibliographic record

VenueВЕСТНИК «Исторические и социально-политические науки» · 2020
Typearticle
Languagekk
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMaritime and Coastal Archaeology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKazakhEmpireState (computer science)Ancient historyHistoryQuarter (Canadian coin)Political scienceLawArchaeologyPhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The article deals with the armed struggle of the Kazakhs against the reforms of the administrations of the Empires of the 20th century. XIX century. on the archival materials of the Russian State Archives. A researcher of the history of the Kazakh people of the first quarter of the 19th century, despite all attempts at capture under the Siberian system, seized the steppe in a long revolt ”, there are detailed examples from the Russian state archive covering Kenesary's struggle to end the plunder of the Russian Empire. In particular, the message of the commander of the second regiment in December 1839, military foreman Kulikov, chief of staff of the separate Siberian corps, Major General Baron von Derg Hoven, that “on December 19, 1839, the Cossacks of the lower rank of the regiment under his leadership were deprived of 17 military names” shows the organized actions of local Kazakhs against the tsarist troops.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.615
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0060.006
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0070.004
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0050.006
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0060.006
Research integrity0.0030.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0710.030

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.160 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueВЕСТНИК «Исторические и социально-политические науки»Same topicMaritime and Coastal ArchaeologyFrench-language works237,207