ҚАЗАҚТАРДЫҢ ХІХ ҒАСЫРДЫҢ 20 ЖЫЛДАРЫНДАҒЫ ИМПЕРИЯЛЫҚ БАСҚАРУ РЕФОРМАЛАРЫНА ҚАРСЫ ҚАРУЛЫ КҮРЕСІ СОЛ МЕРЗІМДЕГІ РЕСЕЙЛІК МЕМЛЕКЕТТІК МҰРАҒАТТАРЫ ДЕРЕКТЕРІНДЕ
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The article deals with the armed struggle of the Kazakhs against the reforms of the administrations of the Empires of the 20th century. XIX century. on the archival materials of the Russian State Archives. A researcher of the history of the Kazakh people of the first quarter of the 19th century, despite all attempts at capture under the Siberian system, seized the steppe in a long revolt ”, there are detailed examples from the Russian state archive covering Kenesary's struggle to end the plunder of the Russian Empire. In particular, the message of the commander of the second regiment in December 1839, military foreman Kulikov, chief of staff of the separate Siberian corps, Major General Baron von Derg Hoven, that “on December 19, 1839, the Cossacks of the lower rank of the regiment under his leadership were deprived of 17 military names” shows the organized actions of local Kazakhs against the tsarist troops.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.017 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".