MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3193665233 · doi:10.1089/chi.2021.0161

Is There a Role for Self-Referral in Pediatric Weight Management?

2021· article· en· W3193665233 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueChildhood Obesity · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicChild and Adolescent Health
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaLakehead University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReferralMedicineWeight managementMultidisciplinary approachObesityFamily medicineMedical recordChildhood obesityHealth careMEDLINESelf-managementWeight lossPediatricsOverweight

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: A physician or health care provider (HCP) referral is usually needed for children to access multidisciplinary health services for obesity management; however, offering families the option to self-refer can enhance equity and access to care. Methods: We completed a retrospective medical record review to explore patient characteristics and program engagement of children with obesity who were self- ( n = 18) or HCP-referred ( n = 120) for obesity management. Results: Our descriptive data suggested that children who were self-referred presented with a healthier clinical profile and missed fewer appointments than their peers referred by HCPs. Conclusions: Prospective research is needed to examine whether health services and treatment outcomes differ between self- and HCP-referred children in obesity management.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.740

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it