MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3193665271

ДЕРЖАВНИЙ КОНТРОЛЬ ЗА СТВОРЕННЯМ, ВИПРОБУВАННЯМ ТА ВИКОРИСТАННЯМ ОРГАНІЗМІВ З НОВИМИ ВЛАСТИВОСТЯМИ: ДОСВІД КАНАДИ

2015· article· uk· W3193665271 on OpenAlex
М О Григорова

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueАктуальні проблеми державного управління · 2015
Typearticle
Languageuk
FieldMedicine
TopicScience, Research, and Medicine
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBusinessState (computer science)Identification (biology)Public administrationPolitical scienceComputer science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Canadian state control of introduction of products of biotechnology and genetic engineeringto bring the experience to establish a system of public administration to ensure biological andgenetic safety in Ukraine is analyzed. It was proved that for the efficient state management in thisarea state authorities need to improve the system for the identification and registration ofgenetically modified organisms and increase the interest of people to these issues, which willcontribute to the full compliance of Ukraine with a number of international obligations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.384
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.004
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0060.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.007
Science and technology studies0.0020.005
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0050.002
Research integrity0.0030.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.025

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.221
GPT teacher head0.442
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it