MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W31936748 · doi:10.3390/jcm9010191

Mechanics of unsaturated soils for the design of foundation structures

2010· article· en· W31936748 on OpenAlexaff
Sai K. Vanapalli, Won Taek Oh

Bibliographic record

VenueEMESEG'10 Proceedings of the 3rd WSEAS international conference on Engineering mechanics, structures, engineering geology · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSoil and Unsaturated Flow
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSoil waterGeotechnical engineeringSoil mechanicsPenetrometerBearing capacitySuctionElasticity (physics)Foundation (evidence)Soil scienceEnvironmental scienceGeologyEngineeringMaterials scienceMechanical engineeringComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Design of foundations for unsaturated soils is based on conventional soil mechanics assuming saturated conditions for soils. In this paper, semi-empirical models for predicting variation of the bearing capacity and the modulus of elasticity with respect to matric suction for unsaturated soils are presented. The saturated soil properties (i.e. bearing capacity and modulus of elasticity) and the Soil-Water Characteristic Curve (i.e. SWCC) are required for using these models. In addition, a simple method is also detailed to estimate matric suction of as-compacted soils using a pocket penetrometer. The proposed techniques are simple and should encourage geotechnical engineers to implement the mechanics of unsaturated soils into practice.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.053

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEMESEG'10 Proceedings of the 3rd WSEAS international conference on Engineering mechanics, structures, engineering geologySame topicSoil and Unsaturated FlowFrench-language works237,207