International Overdose Awareness Day: a time to remember, a time to act, a time for evidence
Bibliographic record
Abstract
August 31 is International Overdose Awareness Day. This global event, launched in 2001, is held annually to raise awareness of overdose and to grieve with friends and family for those we have lost to overdose. It is much more than a day of remembrance; it is a day to act.1 Drug overdoses are preventable. Current drug prohibition policies and substance use stigma are lethal. In many communities, rates of overdose and overdose deaths have been dramatically increasing, with devastating impacts to those responding to overdose events and those who lose someone they care for or love. These deaths often go unacknowledged due to the silence that continues to surround drug use, the stigma of overdose, and, perhaps most significantly, the ongoing criminalization of people who use drugs. International Overdose Awareness Day challenges this silence and stigma as we gather to raise awareness, publically mourn, and call for action to prevent and reduce drug-related harms, particularly overdose, by insisting on evidence-based policies and practices.1 Articles in this issue of JBI Evidence Synthesis seek to contribute to these efforts and to this movement for change and transformation of approaches to drug-related harms. In the article “Equity-oriented frameworks to inform responses to opioid overdoses,”2 we present a scoping review of literature on equity-oriented approaches to preventing and reducing the harms of overdose and substance use stigma. This review highlights the importance of “the inclusion of people with lived and living experience, multifaceted approaches to reduce stigma and discrimination, recognizing and addressing inequities, drug policy reform and decriminalization, applying harm reduction principles within comprehensive responses, and adopting proportionate universalism.”2(p.1773) Overall, the review illustrates how research is being outpaced by the public health crisis and emphasizes the urgent need for evidence linking health equity concepts such as cultural safety, trauma- and violence-informed care, and harm reduction. Because equity is dependent on decolonization, Indigenous-informed perspectives are essential for informing responses to overdose and substance use stigma. In a second scoping review in this issue, “Interventions and programs that support the health and development of infants with prenatal substance exposure in foster care,”3 we address substance use interventions specifically for infants in foster care who have experienced prenatal substance exposure. This review identifies how interventions require a stronger focus on the root causes or determinants of health, such as poverty, homelessness, stigmatization, and trauma, to more fully support birth families and foster care providers. The review also raises the need for a health-equity approach to interventions with families – approaches that are trauma-informed, are culturally appropriate, and address root causes and stressors that result in the placement of infants in care. Combined, these reviews examine health and social care interventions along the life course from prenatal substance exposure and infancy to potential tragedy of early overdose death. The conclusions are similar and reflect the aims of International Overdose Awareness Day, as the findings of both reviews prioritize concepts of health equity and determinants of health as promising approaches and necessary alternatives to reduce and ameliorate one of the world's worst public health crises. While we publically acknowledge those who have died with a day of mourning on August 31, we also seek action. These reviews should contribute to and inform equity-oriented health care interventions that are responsive to reducing substance use stigma and other harms. Now is a time to remember and to act.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.017 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.016 | 0.025 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".