An improved primal-dual approximation algorithm for the <i>k</i>-means problem with penalties
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract In the k -means problem with penalties, we are given a data set $${\cal D} \subseteq \mathbb{R}^\ell $$ of n points where each point $$j \in {\cal D}$$ is associated with a penalty cost p j and an integer k . The goal is to choose a set $${\rm{C}}S \subseteq {{\cal R}^\ell }$$ with |CS| ≤ k and a penalized subset $${{\cal D}_p} \subseteq {\cal D}$$ to minimize the sum of the total squared distance from the points in D / D p to CS and the total penalty cost of points in D p , namely $$\sum\nolimits_{j \in {\cal D}\backslash {{\cal D}_p}} {d^2}(j,{\rm{C}}S) + \sum\nolimits_{j \in {{\cal D}_p}} {p_j}$$ . We employ the primal-dual technique to give a pseudo-polynomial time algorithm with an approximation ratio of (6.357+ ε ) for the k -means problem with penalties, improving the previous best approximation ratio 19.849+ ∊ for this problem given by Feng et al. in Proceedings of FAW (2019).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it