Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le Pole Nord, nouvel eldorado, objet de toutes les convoitises? Ce livre est le premier a analyser cette nouvelle guerre economique et strategique.Aout 2007, deux sous-marins deposent le drapeau russe par 4 200 metres de fond. Le monde decouvre que la bataille du Grand Nord a commence.Ses enjeux sont a la fois economiques, environnementaux et strategiques. En liberant de nouveaux passages maritimes, la fonte des glaces polaires donne acces a des reserves gigantesques de petrole, gaz, or, diamants et minerais rares. La course de vitesse pour leur controle et leur exploitation est d'autant plus âpre que le decoupage des frontieres entre Etats-Unis, Canada, Russie, Danemark et Norvege est loin d'etre abouti, tandis que Chinois, Japonais et autres Europeens sont en embuscade.Cette ruee vers le toit du monde s'effectue dans des zones hautement strategiques depuis la guerre froide, aujourd'hui devenues point d'appui principal du bouclier antimissile americain.Devant des peuples circumpolaires a l'avenir improbable, se deroule la premiere bataille planetaire de la mondialisation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".