MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3193870482 · doi:10.1145/3528223.3530093

Fast evaluation of smooth distance constraints on co-dimensional geometry

2022· article· en· W3193870482 on OpenAlexafffund
Abhishek Madan, David I. W. Levin

Bibliographic record

VenueACM Transactions on Graphics · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
Topic3D Shape Modeling and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersAdobe ResearchConnaught FundNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research ChairsAutodesk
KeywordsIsosurfacePolygon meshPoint cloudComputer scienceSigned distance functionFunction (biology)Point (geometry)AlgorithmAccelerationTriangle meshSurface (topology)GeometryMathematicsTopology (electrical circuits)Computer graphics (images)Computer visionArtificial intelligenceVisualizationCombinatoricsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a new method for computing a smooth minimum distance function based on the LogSumExp function for point clouds, edge meshes, triangle meshes, and combinations of all three. We derive blending weights and a modified Barnes-Hut acceleration approach that ensure our method approximates the true distance, and is conservative (points outside the zero isosurface are guaranteed to be outside the surface) and efficient to evaluate for all the above data types. This, in combination with its ability to smooth sparsely sampled and noisy data, like point clouds, shortens the gap between data acquisition and simulation, and thereby enables new applications such as direct, co-dimensional rigid body simulation using unprocessed lidar data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.354
Threshold uncertainty score0.958

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACM Transactions on GraphicsSame topic3D Shape Modeling and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207