MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3193894044 · doi:10.1093/biostatistics/kxab031

Estimation for the bivariate quantile varying coefficient model with application to diffusion tensor imaging data analysis

2021· article· en· W3193894044 on OpenAlexafffund
Matthew Pietrosanu, Haoxu Shu, Bei Jiang, Linglong Kong, Giseon Heo, Qianchuan He, John H. Gilmore, Hongtu Zhu

Bibliographic record

VenueBiostatistics · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNational Institutes of HealthNational Cancer InstituteNational Institute of Mental HealthCanadian Statistical Sciences InstituteNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of Alberta
KeywordsInterpretabilityBivariate analysisComputer scienceQuantileDiffusion MRIQuantile regressionData setArtificial intelligenceMathematicsEconometricsMachine learning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Despite interest in the joint modeling of multiple functional responses such as diffusion properties in neuroimaging, robust statistical methods appropriate for this task are lacking. To address this need, we propose a varying coefficient quantile regression model able to handle bivariate functional responses. Our work supports innovative insights into biomedical data by modeling the joint distribution of functional variables over their domains and across clinical covariates. We propose an estimation procedure based on the alternating direction method of multipliers and propagation separation algorithms to estimate varying coefficients using a B-spline basis and an $L_2$ smoothness penalty that encourages interpretability. A simulation study and an application to a real-world neurodevelopmental data set demonstrates the performance of our model and the insights provided by modeling functional fractional anisotropy and mean diffusivity jointly and their association with gestational age and sex.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.396
Threshold uncertainty score0.286

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.085
GPT teacher head0.392
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiostatisticsSame topicAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207