To see others in ourselves: justice and architectural ambiguity in the Tuol Sleng Genocide Museum
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Grounded in Amartya Sen’s work on justice, identity, and violence, this article studies the Tuol Sleng Genocide Museum in Cambodia as a space that encourages the ethical assessment of justice through non-didactic, disjunctive resonance between the normative and the unfamiliar. Defining architecture as a meaningful spatio-temporal continuum, the article employs an analytical methodology drawn from creative praxis to argue that our senses of identity are formed through architecture both cognitively, in our response to the known, and affectively, in our experience of the unknown. In order to retain the discursive nature of justice, this continuum needs to operate with a destabilising ambiguity to avoid exclusive ‘othering’. This ambiguity allows for our sense of identity to expand beyond group-based ideologies that can sustain and hide societal violence.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it