MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3193997614 · doi:10.1130/abs/2021cd-363183

CHARACTERIZING ZIRCON PORPHYRY COPPER FERTILITY CHARACTERISTICS IN THE EVOLVING LARAMIDE ARC, EAST-CENTRAL ARIZONA

2021· article· en· W3193997614 on OpenAlexaff
Taylor Ledoux, Craig J.R. Hart

Bibliographic record

VenueAbstracts with programs - Geological Society of America · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicArchaeology and ancient environmental studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsZirconPorphyry copper depositGeologyCopperFertilityGeochemistrySeismologyMaterials sciencePopulationMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Variable Proterozoic Continental Basement Laramide Arc • Arc magmatism migrated eastward • Composite intrusive complexes • Dioritic to granitic intrusions • Magma Composition evolved to be more silicic • Mineralizing intrusions during final stages of magmatism Cenozoic Extension Previous Geochronology Figure 3. Seedorff et al. (2019)Superior District (ca.75.2 to 63.5 Ma) • Silver King ca.75.2 to 72 Ma • Magma Vein ca.73.1 to 65.1 Ma • Resolution ca.70.4 to 63.5 Ma • Superior East ca.65 to 63.5 Ma Globe-Miami District (ca.69.8 to 59.9 Ma) • Schultze Pluton (ca.69.8 to 59.9 Ma) • Pinto Valley/ Carlota (ca.64.1 to 63.1 Ma) • Miami-Inspiration (ca.65.3 to 62.0 Ma) Christmas (ca.66.1 to 63.9 Ma) Ray (ca.72.1 to 64.4 Ma) (Hehnke et al., 2012; Seedorff et al., 2019) Samples Superior District -Silver King • 19CH-AZ1A (equigranular quartz diorite stock) • 19CH-AZ1B/D (equigranular monzonite dyke) • 19CH-AZ1*A (grauss) • 19CH-AZ2/FZ (fluvial-sand)Globe-Miami District • 19CH-AZ6 (porphyritic granodiorite) • 19CH-AZ4/FZ (fluvial-sand) • 19CH-AZ7/FZ (fluvial-sand) Christmas • 19CH-AZ9 (porphyritic monzodiorite) • 19CH-AZ9-XMAS (grauss) Ray • 19CH-RAY (porphyritic granite) • 19CH-AZ10-RAY2 (grauss) Geology after Seedorff et al. (2019) Samples Superior District -Silver King • 19CH-AZ1A (equigranular quartz diorite stock) • 19CH-AZ1B/D (equigranular monzonite dyke) • 19CH-AZ1*A (grauss) • 19CH-AZ2/FZ (fluvial-sand) Globe-Miami District • 19CH-AZ6 (porphyritic granodiorite) • 19CH-AZ4/FZ (fluvial-sand) • 19CH-AZ7/FZ (fluvial-sand) Christmas • 19CH-AZ9 (porphyritic monzodiorite) • 19CH-AZ9-XMAS (grauss) Ray • 19CH-RAY (porphyritic granite) • 19CH-AZ10-RAY2 (grauss) Geology after Seedorff et al. (2019) Superior District Samples Superior District -Silver King • 19CH-AZ1A (equigranular quartz diorite stock) • 19CH-AZ1B/D (equigranular monzonite dyke) • 19CH-AZ1*A (grauss) • 19CH-AZ2/FZ (fluvial-sand) Globe-Miami District • 19CH-AZ6 (porphyritic granodiorite) • 19CH-AZ4/FZ (fluvial-sand) • 19CH-AZ7/FZ (fluvial-sand) Christmas • 19CH-AZ9 (porphyritic monzodiorite) • 19CH-AZ9-XMAS (grauss) Ray • 19CH-RAY (porphyritic granite) • 19CH-AZ10-RAY2 (grauss) Geology after Seedorff et al. (2019) Globe-Miami District Samples Superior District -Silver King • 19CH-AZ1A (equigranular quartz diorite stock) • 19CH-AZ1B/D (equigranular monzonite dyke) • 19CH-AZ1*A (grauss) • 19CH-AZ2/FZ (fluvial-sand) Globe-Miami District • 19CH-AZ6 (porphyritic granodiorite) • 19CH-AZ4/FZ (fluvial-sand) • 19CH-AZ7/FZ (fluvial-sand) Christmas • 19CH-AZ9 (porphyritic monzodiorite) • 19CH-AZ9-XMAS (grauss) Ray • 19CH-RAY (porphyritic granite) • 19CH-AZ10-RAY2 (grauss) Geology after Seedorff et al. (2019) Christmas District SamplesSuperior District -Silver KingGeology after Seedorff et al. (2019) Ray District Geochronology -Superior Dist rict Silver King stock Quartz diorite stock 72.6±2.9 Ma • 72.6 ± 2.9 Ma autocrysts (25/25) Monzonite dike 72.0± 2.3 Ma • 72.0± 2.3 Ma autocrysts (4/15) • 77.3± 2.3 Ma antecrysts (5/15) • 1407± 290 Ma xenocrysts (6/15) Silver King Grauss 70.3± 1.8 Ma • 65.72± 5.49 Ma (1/9) • 70.3± 1.8 Ma (7/9) • 77.77± 4.47 Ma (1/9) Fluvial Sand 81.42 to 65.84 Ma • Laramide 81.42 to 65.84 Ma (57/57) 19CH-AZ1B/D Geochronology -Globe-Miami Dist rict (Schult ze plut on) Schultze pluton Porphyritic granodiorite 64.2± 3.1 Ma • 64.2± 3.1 Ma autocrysts (2/16) • 1579± 90 Ma xenocrysts (14/16) NW Pinto Valley Fluvial sand 16.34 to 1604 Ma • Early Miocene 20.30 to 16.34 (34/53) • Laramide 81.0 to 58.84 Ma (10/53) • Proterozoic 1072, 1386, and 1604 Ma (9/53) SE Miami-Inspiration Fluvial sand 18.42 to 1603 Ma • Early Miocene 21.84 to 18.42 (2/56) • Laramide 78.20 to 55.97 (25/56) • Proterozoic 1603± 69 Ma (9/56)Thanks for list ening

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.225
Threshold uncertainty score0.447

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueAbstracts with programs - Geological Society of AmericaSame topicArchaeology and ancient environmental studiesFrench-language works237,207