Efficient Federated Meta-Learning Over Multi-Access Wireless Networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Federated meta-learning (FML) has emerged as a promising paradigm to cope with the data limitation and heterogeneity challenges in today’s edge learning arena. However, its performance is often limited by slow convergence and corresponding low communication efficiency. In addition, since the available radio spectrum and IoT devices’ energy capacity are usually insufficient, it is crucial to control the resource allocation and energy consumption when deploying FML in practical wireless networks. To overcome the challenges, in this paper, we rigorously analyze the contribution of each device to the global loss reduction in each round and develop an FML algorithm (called NUFM) with a non-uniform device selection scheme to accelerate the convergence. After that, we formulate a resource allocation problem integrating NUFM in multi-access wireless systems to jointly improve the convergence rate and minimize the wall-clock time along with energy cost. By deconstructing the original problem step by step, we devise a joint device selection and resource allocation strategy to solve the problem with theoretical guarantees. Further, we show that the computational complexity of NUFM can be reduced from$O(d^{2})$to$O(d)$(with the model dimension$d$) via combining two first-order approximation techniques. Extensive simulation results demonstrate the effectiveness and superiority of the proposed methods in comparison with existing baselines.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".