Cerebral Microbleeds and White Matter Hyperintensities are Associated with Cognitive Decline in an Asian Memory Clinic Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cerebral Small Vessel Disease (SVD); lacunes, Cerebral Microbleeds (CMBs), and White Matter Hyperintensities (WMH) have a vital role in cognitive impairment and dementia. SVD in lobar location is related to cerebral amyloid angiopathy, whereas SVD in a deep location with hypertensive arteriopathy. It remains unclear how different locations of SVD affect long-term cognitive decline. The present study aimed to analyse the association between different locations and severity of SVD with global and domain-specific cognitive decline over the follow-up interval of 3 years. METHODS: We studied 428 participants who had performed MRI scans at baseline and at least 3 neuropsychological assessments. Locations of lacunes and CMBs were categorized into strictly lobar, strictly deep and mixed-location, WMH volume into anterior and posterior. The National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke-Canadian Stroke Network Harmonization Neuropsychological Battery was used to assess cognitive function. To analyse the association between baseline location and severity of SVD with cognitive decline, linear regression models with generalized estimated equations were constructed to calculate the mean difference, 95% confidence interval and two-way interaction factor between time and SVD. RESULTS: Increased numbers of baseline CMBs were associated with a decline in global cognition as well as a decline in executive function and memory domains. Location-specific analysis showed similar results with strictly lobar CMBs. There was no association with strictly deep and mixed-location CMBs with cognitive decline. Baseline WMH volume was associated with a decline in global cognition, executive function and memory. Similar results were obtained with anterior and posterior WMH volumes. Lacunes and their locations were not associated with cognitive decline. CONCLUSION: Strictly lobar CMBs, as well as WMH volume in anterior and posterior regions, were associated with cognitive decline. Future research focuses are warranted to evaluate interventions that may prevent cognitive decline related to SVD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".