155 GHz FMCW and Stepped-Frequency Carrier OFDM Radar Sensor Transceiver IC Featuring a PLL With <30 ns Settling Time and 40 fs rms Jitter
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A radar transceiver with two transmitters (TXs) and two receivers (RXs) is reported in 22 nm fully depleted silicon-on-insulator (FDSOI) CMOS. It includes a novel 200 MHz bandwidth 80 GHz phase-locked loop (PLL) based on a single-sideband (SSB) upconverter and an 11 GHz bandwidth phase-frequency detector to achieve >8 GHz locking range with record phase noise of −97, −103, and −113 dBc/Hz at 100 kHz, 1 MHz, and 10 MHz offset, respectively, and rms jitter < 40 fs. Stepped-frequency chirps with orthogonal frequency-division multiplexing (OFDM) modulation covering the 152–160 GHz range were demonstrated in a through-the-air loopback link along with a record settling time < 30 ns, limited by the test equipment. The RXs have an IIP3 of −8 dBm, SSB noise figure between 7.5 and 10 dB and a conversion gain of 15 dB, controllable from the LNA back gate over a range of 12 dB. The OP <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">1 dB</sub> and <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$P_{\mathrm {SAT}}$ </tex-math></inline-formula> of the power amplifier (PA) in each TX are 5 and 9 dBm, respectively. The IQ amplitude mismatch and phase error of each RX are < 0.5 dB and 1°, respectively, while the <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$P_{\mathbf {out}}$ </tex-math></inline-formula> mismatch between the TXs is < 1 dB. The sensor consumes 1.13 W, with 300 mW by the PLL, 275 mW by the 160 GHz local oscillator (LO)-tree, 190 mW by each TX, and 87.5 mW by each RX.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it