MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3194210686 · doi:10.1109/tmtt.2021.3094189

155 GHz FMCW and Stepped-Frequency Carrier OFDM Radar Sensor Transceiver IC Featuring a PLL With <30 ns Settling Time and 40 fs rms Jitter

2021· article· en· W3194210686 on OpenAlexafffund
Alireza Zandieh, Shai Bonen, M. Sadegh Dadash, Ming Gong, Jürgen Hasch, Sorin P. Voinigescu

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRadio Frequency Integrated Circuit Design
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaRobert Bosch
KeywordsPhase-locked loopPhase noiseTransceiverElectrical engineeringJitterAmplifierCMOSElectronic engineeringdBcPhysicsFrequency offsetOrthogonal frequency-division multiplexingEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A radar transceiver with two transmitters (TXs) and two receivers (RXs) is reported in 22 nm fully depleted silicon-on-insulator (FDSOI) CMOS. It includes a novel 200 MHz bandwidth 80 GHz phase-locked loop (PLL) based on a single-sideband (SSB) upconverter and an 11 GHz bandwidth phase-frequency detector to achieve >8 GHz locking range with record phase noise of −97, −103, and −113 dBc/Hz at 100 kHz, 1 MHz, and 10 MHz offset, respectively, and rms jitter1 dBand$P_{\mathrm {SAT}}$of the power amplifier (PA) in each TX are 5 and 9 dBm, respectively. The IQ amplitude mismatch and phase error of each RX are$P_{\mathbf {out}}$mismatch between the TXs is < 1 dB. The sensor consumes 1.13 W, with 300 mW by the PLL, 275 mW by the 160 GHz local oscillator (LO)-tree, 190 mW by each TX, and 87.5 mW by each RX.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.188
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and TechniquesSame topicRadio Frequency Integrated Circuit DesignFrench-language works237,207