MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3194390404 · doi:10.14288/1.0401370

Optimization of connection between traditional Japanese post and beam frames and Midply infills

2021· article· en· W3194390404 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Collections · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Load-Bearing Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConnection (principal bundle)Computer scienceMathematicsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This thesis studied an optimized application of screw connections for a novel Japanese post and beam (J-P&B) shear wall system using Midply elements as infills. The connection is a single shear timber-to-timber screw connection between the frame's posts/beams and Midply's studs/chords. The research aimed to design an efficient connection composed of stronger but fewer fasteners based on theoretical and experimental studies. The connection's theoretical analysis was conducted first using EN1995, O86, and Tomasi methods, which revealed the remarkable contribution of the connection's axial resistance to the overall performance. High connection load-carrying capacities were obtained using inclined installed screws with appropriately arranged threads in both wood members. The analytical results were verified by 12 types of connection tests under monotonic load and 3 types of connection tests under reversed-cyclic load. Eventually, connection type 'CYL260-45V-18H' was selected as the candidate for use in the optimized system. A finite element (FE) model MPBWALL was developed to simulate the push-over response of the shear wall system, using the commercial software package SAP2000. Because of the particular layout of Midply, the sheathing's deformation is confined by studs/cords on both sides. The consequent 'stiffening' effect was considered in the model. Results of MPBWALL suggested two optimized wall configurations, MPB-01 and MPB-02, using CYL260-45V-18H as the connection. A total of 4 full-size shear walls were tested both under monotonic and reversed-cyclic load. Compared to conventional solutions, the optimized system yielded a higher wall multiplier of 5.52 (evaluation index of Japanese shear wall) using 38% fewer fasteners. In addition, the relative slip between the frame and infill was significantly reduced.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.535
Threshold uncertainty score0.369

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen CollectionsSame topicStructural Load-Bearing AnalysisFrench-language works237,207