MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3194489921 · doi:10.1111/sapm.12438

Existence, uniqueness and stability of forced waves to the Lotka‐Volterra competition system in a shifting environment

2021· article· en· W3194489921 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueStudies in Applied Mathematics · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology Models
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsUniquenessMathematicsStability (learning theory)Interval (graph theory)Competition (biology)Mathematical analysisWave speedTraveling waveControl theory (sociology)Computer scienceEcologyCombinatorics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We studied the existence, uniqueness, and stability of forced traveling waves for the Lotka–Volterra competition system in a shifting habitat. Based on the asymptotic behaviors of the wave profiles and by means of upper–lower solution method coupled with sliding technique, we showed that the forced wave for the system exists and is unique, when the forced speed lies in a specific interval. Explicit expressions of the two end pointsof this interval were derived and our finding indicated that they are related to the Fisher‐KPP‐type invasion speed. Furthermore, we established a squeezing theorem to show the local stability of the forced waves. Finally, with the aid of comparison principle, we established the global stability of the forced waves when the initial data were properly assigned.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.213
Threshold uncertainty score0.297

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.074
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it