MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

EP51* Burden of<i>tough to retrieve</i>clots in acute ischemic stroke: clinical and economic impact of increasing retrieval attempts in mechanical thrombectomy

2021· article· en· W3194493504 on OpenAlexaff
Jack Alderson, Shelly Ikeme, C. Tong, Heather Cameron, John Thornton

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management
Canadian institutionsEVERSANA (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineOddsOdds ratioConfoundingObservational studyStroke (engine)Retrospective cohort studyInternal medicineCardiologyIschemic strokeLogistic regressionSurgeryIschemia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction Emerging data show an association between increased mechanical thrombectomy (MT) passes and poor outcomes in ischemic stroke. Clots that require ≥3 passes are more often tough, fibrin-rich thrombi than those retrieved within two passes. Aims To assess the clinical and economic burden of number of MT passes, we evaluated the odds of achieving successful reperfusion and functional independence in first pass, or 2–3 passes, compared to ≥4 passes. Methods A retrospective observational study was conducted on 857 cases treated with MT from the Irish National Thrombectomy database. Outcomes were 90-day functional independence (mRS 0–2) and successful reperfusion (mTICI 2b-3) stratified by number of passes (1; 2–3; and ≥4) with multivariable regression to adjust for confounding variables. A decision-tree economic model was informed by 90-day mRS: independent (0–2), dependent (3–5), or dead, with literature-derived annual healthcare costs by mRS. Results The odds of achieving successful reperfusion were significantly higher for 1 vs. ≥4 passes (OR 7.19, p<0.001); and for 2–3 vs. ≥4 passes (OR 3.19, p<0.001). The odds of functional independence were significantly higher for 1 vs. ≥4 passes (OR 2.51, p<0.001); and trended higher for 2–3 vs. ≥4 passes (OR 1.49, p=0.199). Patients treated with 1 pass had the lowest annual healthcare costs ($20,910); 2–3 passes ($21,999) ≥4 passes ($25,904). Conclusion Odds of achieving good outcomes decline with MT passes, while care costs increase. Thrombectomy devices that improve interaction with tough clots for rapid and complete retrieval in fewer passes may improve clinical and economic outcomes. References Yoo AJ. Journal of Stroke 2017;19(2):121. Douglas A. JNIS 2020;12(6):557–562. Liebeskind DS. Stroke 2011;42(5):1237–1243. Abbasi M. Interventional Neuroradiology 2021;202115910199211009119. Siddiqui AH. Stroke 2021;52(Suppl_1):AP14–AP14. García-Tornel Á. Stroke 2019;50(7):1781–1788. Shireman TI. Stroke 2017;48(2):379–387. Disclosure Dr. Jack Alderson, Radiology, Beaumont Hospital. Prof. Dr. John Thornton, Neuroradiology, Beaumont Hospital. Consultancy for Johnson & Johnson, Perfuze and Microvention. Shareholder Perfuze. Cindy Tong and Shelly Ikeme are employees of Johnson & Johnson. Heather Cameron is an employee of EVERSANA, a consultant for Johnson & Johnson. This research is funded by Cerenovus – a company of Johnson & Johnson

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.344
Teacher spread0.321 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management→French-language works237,207→