MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3194505801 · doi:10.1101/2021.08.20.457124

Spacer2PAM: A computational framework for identification of functional PAM sequences for endogenous CRISPR systems

2021· preprint· en· W3194505801 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Grant A. Rybnicky, Nicholas Fackler, Ashty S. Karim, Michael Köpke, Michael C. Jewett

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2021
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCRISPR and Genetic Engineering
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersJoint Genome InstituteSuncor Energy IncorporatedU.S. Department of EnergyDavid and Lucile Packard FoundationNational Science Foundation
KeywordsCRISPRTrans-activating crRNAComputational biologyCRISPR interferenceBiologyGenome editingComputer scienceGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract RNA-guided nucleases from clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) systems expand opportunities for precise, targeted genome modification. Endogenous CRISPR systems in many bacteria and archaea are particularly attractive to circumvent expression, functionality, and unintended activity hurdles posed by heterologous CRISPR effectors. However, each CRISPR system recognizes a unique set of PAM sequences, which requires extensive screening of randomized DNA libraries. This challenge makes it difficult to develop endogenous CRISPR systems, especially in organisms that are slow-growing or have transformation idiosyncrasies. To address this limitation, we present Spacer2PAM, an easy-to-use, easy-to-interpret R package built to identify potential PAM sequences for any CRISPR system given its corresponding CRISPR array as input. Spacer2PAM can be used in “Quick” mode to generate a single PAM prediction that is likely to be functional or in “Comprehensive” mode to inform targeted, unpooled PAM libraries small enough to screen in difficult to transform organisms. We demonstrate Spacer2PAM by predicting PAM sequences for industrially relevant organisms and experimentally identifying seven PAM sequences that mediate interference from the Spacer2PAM-predicted PAM library for the type I-B CRISPR system from Clostridium autoethanogenum . We anticipate that Spacer2PAM will facilitate the use of endogenous CRISPR systems for industrial biotechnology and synthetic biology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.035

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicCRISPR and Genetic Engineering→French-language works237,207→