A <scp>circularly polarized</scp>, high aperture efficiency metasurface antenna
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract A circularly polarized, high aperture efficiency antenna based on metasurface (MTS), inexpensively fabricated using a standard printed circuit board (PCB) technology, is presented. An array of 8 8 cross‐shaped resonators was designed to operate at 3.1 GHz with a 12 cm 12 cm (i.e., 1.24 1.24 ) footprint size. Each resonator was double fed (by two lines) with appropriate phases to achieve circular polarization. Full characterization of the designed antenna was achieved using full‐wave simulations. The MTS antenna was fabricated using a multilayer PCB technology and experimentally tested. A good agreement between the simulation results and measurements was observed. According to the measurements, with a realized gain of 11.1 dBi, the antenna has an aperture efficiency of 66.7%, which is high compared to many other antennas.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".