Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Menendang (Shooting) Sepak Bola Melalui Modifikasi Latihan Target
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Tujuan Penelitian. Dalam meningkatkan hasil belajar Menendang (Shooting) Pada Permainan Sepak Bola Melalui Modifikasi Latihan Target pada siswa kelas IV SDS KARTIKA VIII-2 semester genap pada tahun ajaran 2019/2020 Metode Penelitian. penelitian tindakan kelas yang mengikuti model Kemmis dan Taggart. Penelitian ini mencakup 2 siklus dimana masing-masing siklus mencakup 4 tahap yaitu planning (perencanaan), acting (pelaksanaan), observasing (pengamatan), reflecting (refleksi). subjek penelitian sebanyak 25 siswa, sedangkan data dikumpulkan melalui test dan obsevasi Hasil. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa terjadi peningkatan hasil belajar yang signifikan pada siswa kelas IV. Hal ini dibuktikan dengan persentase siswa kelas IV yang mencapai nilai KKM tes Menendang (Shooting) dalam permainan sepakbola pada setiap siklusnya. Pada siklus I = 64%; siklus II = 88%, dengan hasil persentase tersebut terbukti pada siklus I ke siklus II mengalami peningkatan sebesar 24%. Kesimpulan. Menendang (Shooting) Pada Permainan Sepak Bola Melalui Modifikasi Latihan Target dapat meningkatkan keterampilan Menendang (Shooting) siswa.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.009 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it