MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3194815760 · doi:10.21423/aabppro20133825

Evaluation of monthly individual cow somatic cell count data to predict the risk of exceeding a bulk-tank somatic cell count threshold of 400,000 c/mL

2013· article· en· W3194815760 on OpenAlexaffabout
V. Fauteux, Jean‐Philippe Roy, Émile Bouchard, Daniel T. Scholl, Denis Haine

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Association of Bovine Practitioners Conference Proceedings · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicMilk Quality and Mastitis in Dairy Cows
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUdderSomatic cell countHerdSomatic cellBulk tankAnimal scienceMastitisVeterinary medicineMedicineLimit (mathematics)BiologyLactationMathematicsIce calvingPathologyPregnancy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Since August 2012, the upper tolerance limit for bulk-tank somatic cell count (BTSCC) in Canada is 400,000 c/mL. Among Quebec's dairy herds in 2011, 13% of BTSCC analyses exceeded that limit and were at risk of financial penalties. Herd indices on the basis of individual-cow somatic cell count (SCC) variations around a threshold of 200,000 c/mL between 2 consecutive months in lactation have been described (proportion of cows cured, new 'intramammary infection [NIMI], healthy or chronic) and could be used to monitor the dynamics of herd udder health. The objective of this study was to use individual-cow udder health indices for the preceding 3-month period to develop a predictive model to estimate the risk of exceeding the BTSCC limit of 400,000 c/mL the following month.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.093
Threshold uncertainty score0.185

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Association of Bovine Practitioners Conference ProceedingsSame topicMilk Quality and Mastitis in Dairy CowsFrench-language works237,207