Overexpression of HOP2 induces developmental defects and compromises growth in Arabidopsis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract HOMOLOGOUS PAIRING 2 (HOP2) is a predominantly meiotic protein that plays a pivotal role in homologous chromosome pairing in organisms as diverse as yeast and mammals. While generating HOP2::GFP reporter lines, we identified two Arabidopsis T-DNA insertion mutants, stunted1 ( std1 ) and stunted2 ( std2 ) that exhibit pleiotropic phenotypes, including fasciated stems, altered phyllotaxy, floral organ defects, reduced fecundity, and an overall reduction in growth properties. TAIL-PCR followed by sequencing revealed several insertions near genes, but genotyping showed that none of the insertions are causal. Analysis the std mutants by qRT-PCR, and analysis of dexamethasone inducible HOP2 transgenic plants demonstrated that the std phenotypes are associated with ectopic/overexpression of HOP2. Based on the postulated mechanisms of HOP2 action, we speculate on how overexpression leads to these developmental/growth defects.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".