Artificial Intelligence‐ (AI‐) Enabled Internet of Things (IoT) for Secure Big Data Processing in Multihoming Networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The automated techniques enabled with Artificial Neural Networks (ANN), Internet of Things (IoT), and cloud‐based services affect the real‐time analysis and processing of information in a variety of applications. In addition, multihoming is a type of network that combines various types of networks into a single environment while managing a huge amount of data. Nowadays, the big data processing and monitoring in multihoming networks provide less attention while reducing the security risk and efficiency during processing or monitoring the information. The use of AI‐based systems in multihoming big data with IoT‐ and AI‐integrated systems may benefit in various aspects. Although multihoming security issues and their analysis have been well studied by various scientists and researchers; however, not much attention is paid towards big data security processing in multihoming especially using automated techniques and systems. The aim of this paper is to propose an IoT‐based artificial network to process and compute big data processing by ensuring a secure communication multihoming network using the Bayesian Rule (BR) and Levenberg‐Marquardt (LM) algorithms. Further, the efficiency and effect on multihoming information processing using an AI‐assisted mechanism are experimented over various parameters such as classification accuracy, classification time, specificity, sensitivity, ROC, and F‐measure.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".