MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3194855278 · doi:10.7554/elife.70119

The BigBrainWarp toolbox for integration of BigBrain 3D histology with multimodal neuroimaging

2021· article· en· W3194855278 on OpenAlexafffund
Casey Paquola, Jessica Royer, Lindsay B. Lewis, Claude Lepage, Tristan Glatard, Konrad Wagstyl, Jordan DeKraker, Paule-J Toussaint, Sofie L. Valk, D. Louis Collins, Ali R. Khan, Katrin Amunts, Alan C. Evans, Timo Dickscheid, Boris C. Bernhardt

Bibliographic record

VenueeLife · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsWestern UniversityMcGill UniversityMontreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
FundersFonds de Recherche du Québec - SantéSick Kids FoundationCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchCentre Azrieli de recherche sur l'autisme, Institut et Hôpital Neurologiques de MontréalHelmholtz AssociationNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsToolboxNeuroimagingWorkflowComputer scienceData scienceArtificial intelligenceHuman–computer interactionNeurosciencePsychologyDatabase

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Neuroimaging stands to benefit from emerging ultrahigh-resolution 3D histological atlases of the human brain; the first of which is 'BigBrain'. Here, we review recent methodological advances for the integration of BigBrain with multi-modal neuroimaging and introduce a toolbox, 'BigBrainWarp', that combines these developments. The aim of BigBrainWarp is to simplify workflows and support the adoption of best practices. This is accomplished with a simple wrapper function that allows users to easily map data between BigBrain and standard MRI spaces. The function automatically pulls specialised transformation procedures, based on ongoing research from a wide collaborative network of researchers. Additionally, the toolbox improves accessibility of histological information through dissemination of ready-to-use cytoarchitectural features. Finally, we demonstrate the utility of BigBrainWarp with three tutorials and discuss the potential of the toolbox to support multi-scale investigations of brain organisation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Software · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.083
Threshold uncertainty score0.278

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0040.005
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0830.033

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.362
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreSoftware

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations96
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeLifeSame topicAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207