MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3194875152

POLÍTICA EXTERNA DOS ESTADOS UNIDOS: DO NAFTA AO USMCA

2020· article· gl· W3194875152 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Andressa Mendes

Bibliographic record

VenueREVISTA DE ESTUDOS INTERNACIONAIS · 2020
Typearticle
Languagegl
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicInternational Relations in Latin America
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceGovernment (linguistics)HumanitiesGovernoEconomic historyPhilosophyEconomics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

O NAFTA, ratificado em 1993 pelo entao presidente Bill Clinton, e composto por EUA, Mexico e Canada. Foi o arranjo institucional, que pautava o comercio entre os paises desde 1994 ate ser desfeito e substituido pelo United States Mexico Canada Agreement (USMCA) durante o governo Trump (2017 - em andamento). A partir disso, o artigo tem como objetivo entender quais os principais aspectos da politica externa dos Estados Unidos durante os governos de Barack Obama e Donald Trump, no que concerne o NAFTA e a criacao do acordo substituto ao bloco. Alem disso, verificar se houve, ou nao, mudanca na formulacao da politica externa comercial dos EUA durante esses dois governos. A hipotese geral e a de que houve uma mudanca na politica externa dos Estados Unidos do governo Obama para o governo Trump no que tange o processo de integracao com o Canada e Mexico no âmbito do NAFTA, especificamente na variavel negociacao. Para tanto, sera usada uma analise historica como metodologia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.505
Threshold uncertainty score0.984

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0050.002
Scholarly communication0.0070.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.305 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueREVISTA DE ESTUDOS INTERNACIONAISSame topicInternational Relations in Latin AmericaFrench-language works237,207