Optik Disk Hipoplazili Bir Çocukta Kanada Okupasyonel Perfomans Modeli’ne Göre Ergoterapi Müdahalesinin Etkinliğinin İncelenmesi: Olgu Çalışması
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Optic disc hypoplasia (ODH) is a non-progressive condition that can develop unilaterally or bilaterally, with decreased retinal nerve fiber count and normally developing retinal tissue. Decreased vision, visual field changes and defects in color vision mau be seen in individuals with ODH. A 3-year-old male pediatric case with ODH in the right eye was included in the study. The Canadian Model of Occupational Performance (CMOP) was used for the holistic evaluation of the individual, environmental and ocupational factors of the case, and the Visual Perception Reference Frame was used for the intervention application. The problem areas within the scope of CMOP were determined as difficulty in holding cutlery and therefore eating by spilling food, inability to distinguish small pictures on paper, weakness in perception of color and figure-ground, and weakness in gross motor skills (standing on one leg, jumping in place). The short-term goals in the 8-week intervention plan, development of visual discrimination (recognition, matching, classification) skills, development of color perception and figure perception, increasing the level of independence in eating with the help of auxiliary equipment (thickened cutlery); the long-term goals were determined as the development of figure-ground perception, the development of visual attention and the development of visual motor integration. With the target spesicif occupational therapy intervention program, the case was able to eat independently with the help of thickened cutlery, to be able to combine simple figures, large pieces and brightly colored puzzle pieces, to increase the time to stand on one leg, and to jump on two legs. There is a need for more evidence-based occupational therapy studies including visual perception studies in diagnoses affecting the visual field such as ODH.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".