STRATEGI PEMASARAN DALAM UPAYA PENINGKATAN HUNIAN KAMAR PADA SENSE SUNSET SEMINYAK HOTEL
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Meningkatnya jumlah wisatawan yang datang ke Bali maka akan mempengaruhi juga pengembangan fasilitas pariwisata seperti sarana akomodasi maupun fasilitas-fasilitas penunjang lainnya. Tujuan dalam penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui kekuatan dan kelemahan Sense Sunset Seminyak Hotel dalam melakukan kegiatan pemasaran, untuk mengetahui peluang dan ancaman yang dihadapi oleh Sense Sunset Seminyak Hotel, untuk mengetahui strategi pemasaran yang digunakan dalam upaya meningkatkan tingkat hunian kamar pada Sense Sunset Seminyak Hotel. Teknik pengumpulan data dengan observasi, wawancara, dan kuesioner. Teknik analisis data menggunakan Analsis EFAS, IFAS dan Analisis SWOT. Hasil Penelitian menyatakan bahwa posisi Sense sunset seminyak Hotel berada pada kwadran I yaitu strategi Growth atau Strategi integrasi vertical. Analisis SWOT menemukan beberapa alternatif strategi pemasaran dalam rangka meningkatkan occupancy yaitu Startegi SO: peningkatan intensitas periklanan dan penciptaan Hotel Bisnis, Staretgi WO: menciptakan Press relationship dan penjadwalan personal selling, Stretgi ST: memperkokoh Brand Image. Strategi WT: meningkatkan peran public relation dalam rangka menghadapi ekonomi global
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".