MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3194931972 · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3899107

Kidney Function in Oral Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Users: A Systematic Literature Review and Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis

2021· article· en· W3194931972 on OpenAlexaff
Robin Schaefer, Pedro Amparo da Costa Leite, Ronaldo Silva, Quarraisha Abdool Karim, Christopher Akolo, Carlos F. Cáceres, Inês Dourado, Kimberly Green, Anita Hettema, Elske Hoornenborg, Smarajit Jana, Bernhard Kerschberger, Hally Mahler, Sindy Matse, Hamish McManus, Jean‐Michel Molina, Sushena Reza‐Paul, Iskandar Azwa, Maryam Shahmanesh, Doug Taylor, Hamid Vega-Ramírez, Valdiléa G. Veloso, Rachel Baggaley, Shona Dalal

Bibliographic record

VenueSSRN Electronic Journal · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMeta-analysisSystematic reviewMedicineFunction (biology)Renal functionIntensive care medicineMEDLINEPsychologyInternal medicineBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.014
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.033
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (broad)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: Meta-analysis
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.981
Threshold uncertainty score0.075

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0140.033
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0190.043
Bibliometrics0.0040.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueSSRN Electronic Journal→Same topicHIV/AIDS Research and Interventions→French-language works237,207→