Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An aerial display that can float a two-dimensional image or a three-dimensional object in an empty space is important as a noncontact interface. Aerial displays have two types: a reflection type that uses a mirror and a refraction type that involves a lens. The latter has the advantage of being easily miniaturized because the path of light does not bend much. The method using two commercially available lenticular lenses is inexpensive. However, the principle of the method is not yet fully understood. In this study, the rules of light rays passing through the lens were applied to explain this principle clearly. For further confirmation, a simulation was performed. Results revealed that the lens group consisting of two convex lenses arranged at the interval of twice the focal length as well as the lens group consisting of three convex lenses arranged at intervals the focal length reflected parallel rays coming from an angle as if they were mirrors. When the number of lenses was set to 3, the viewing range widened.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it