The Experiments of Grafting Propagation for Wintersweet (<i>Chmonanthus praecox</i>) in Autumn and Winter
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Taking different varieties of wintersweet ( Chmonanthus praecox ) as test materials, the influence of different grafting times, stock ages, and scion positions on the survival percentage of wintersweet grafting were studied, in order to study the key techniques of wintersweet grafting in autumn and winter. The results showed that, in autumn and winter, the grafting survival percentage of wintersweet in late-september was significantly higher than that of mid-october, late-october, and mid-november；with the passage of time, the survival percentage of wintersweet grafting showed a gradual downward trend；there is no obvious regularity of the effect of the different scion positions on the survival percentage of wintersweet grafting in autumn and winter；the survival percentage of grafting with perennial seedlings as rootstocks (56.03%) was significantly higher than that of annual seedlings (21.14%). This research provides technical guidance for the production, reproduction, introduction and expanding of wintersweet in autumn and winter.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".