MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3194996499

Econarrative as Politics or Culture – an Issue of Conflict?

2014· article· en· W3194996499 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Anne Holden Rønning

Bibliographic record

VenueLe Simplegadi · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicEcocriticism and Environmental Literature
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEcocriticismHumanitiesArtArt historyLiterature
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Il presente articolo analizza come alcuni scrittori indigeni abbiano utilizzato le problematiche ambientali come un modo per enfatizzare il loro attaccamento culturale alla terra. Alcuni testi letterari provenienti dall’Australia e dalla Nuova Zelanda costituiranno le fondamenta della mia argomentazione, dal momento che i conflitti sul territorio hanno avuto un effetto seminale sulla loro stesura, sotto forma di protesta contro lo sfruttamento o malinteso sui concetti. Tali scrittori sono anche forieri di un messaggio positivo che mostra come si possa vivere in armonia con la natura. Nella societa contemporanea, dove tutto e tutti subiscono l’impatto delle tendenze globali, essi rappresentano un paradigma transculturale, varcando ripetutamente i confini culturali. Bibliografia Carrigan, Anthony. 2011. Postcolonial Tourism. Literature, Culture and Environment . London-New York: Routledge. Clark, Timothy. 2011. The Cambridge Introduction to Literature and the Environment . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Cochrane, Kathie. 1994. Oodgeroo. St. Lucia: University of Queensland Press. Garrard, Greg. 2012 [2nd ed.]. Ecocriticism . London-New York: Routledge. Glotfelty, Cheryll & Harald Fromm ed. 1996. The Ecocriticism Reader: Landmarks in Literary Ecology . Athens-London: University of Georgia Press. Grace, Patricia. 1987 [1986]. Potiki . London: The Women’s Press. Huggan, Graham & Helen Tiffin. 2010. Postcolonial Ecocriticism: Literature, Animals, Environment. London-New York: Routledge. Ihimaera, Witi. 2003 [1987]. The Whale Rider . Auckland: Reed. Ireland, David. 1989 [1974]. Burn. Auckland: Angus & Robertson. Noonuccal, Oodgeroo. 1990 [1970]. My People . Milton, (QLD): Jacaranda Wiley. Noonuccal, Oodgeroo. 1994 [1972]. Dreamtime: Aboriginal Stories . New York: Lothrop, Lee & Shepard Books. Quayson, Ato. 2003. Calibrations: Reading for the Social . Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. Teagle Kapetas, Jan, Ivy Dodd, Valmae Dalgetty Walley, Fiona Stafford & Kay Wally ed. 2000. From Our Hearts. An Anthology of New Aboriginal Writing from Southwest Western Australia. Freemantle: Kadadjiny Mia Walyalup Writers. Wordsworth, William. 1950 [1904]. The Poetical Works of Wordsworth . Thomas Hutchinson & Ernest de Selincourt ed. London-New York-Toronto: Oxford University Press.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.012
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.018
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.064

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0120.018
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.005
Science and technology studies0.0100.059
Scholarly communication0.0260.025
Open science0.0020.010
Research integrity0.0050.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLe SimplegadiSame topicEcocriticism and Environmental LiteratureFrench-language works237,207