ДЕРЖАВНЕ РЕГУЛЮВАННЯ ТРАНСПОРТНОЇ ІНФРАСТРУКТУРИ ЕКОНОМІКИ: ІДЕНТИФІКАЦІЯ ПОНЯТІЙНОГО АПАРАТУ
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Identification of proper conceptual apparatus of the governmental regulation of transport infrastructure of the economy through research and analysis main categories of conceptual apparatus has been provided by studying the historical aspects of their origin. Relying on listed components transport infrastructure in a number of terms provided “infrastructure”, it enables to define the ’system of transport infrastructure’ as more appropriate to use academically. Numerous definitions of ’infrastructure’ and ’transport infrastructure’ were examined in a narrow sense in terms of both economics and philosophical understanding of all constituent elements that can be considered in. Natural and the newest ones were created by mankind infrastructure elements were not sufficiently reflected in defining of ’transport infrastructure’ term which is used for transportation not only through people’s needs and goods but also information and communication, etc. Clarification of categories and suggested author’s definition the ’governmental regulation of transport infrastructure of the economy’ term is provided and is meant as a purposeful and active influence of public administration system on functioning and developing relationships in transport infrastructure of the economy by applying various mechanisms of public administration. Then, considering the essential aspects proposed definition “governmental regulation of transport infrastructure of the economy”, an interaction of the two systems which are in turn is the subject and object of processes state and public administration, has been noted. Due to each of the systems includes significant number of items, they should be considered systematically and find out some hidden relationships between their elements, especially nowadays, to understanding tangible and intangible assets towards the spread of virtual, digital assets and what, by the way, is of increasing interest in modern states and governments (e.g. Japan, Canada, Germany, Ukraine, Qatar etc.).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.023 | 0.042 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it