Evaluation of the Brain Function State During Mild Cognitive Impairment Based on Weighted Multiple Multiscale Entropy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The mild cognitive impairment (MCI) stage plays an essential role in preventing the progression of older adults to Alzheimer's disease. In this study, neurofeedback training (NFT) is applied to improve MCI brain cognitive function. To assess the improvement effect, a novel algorithm called Weighted Multiple Multiscale Entropy (WMMSE) is proposed to extract and analyze the electroencephalogram (EEG) features of patients with MCI. To overcome the information loss problem of traditional multiscale entropy (MSE), WMMSE fully considered the correlation of the sequence and the contribution of each sequence to the total entropy. The experimental group composed of 39 patients with MCI was subjected to NFT for 10 days during two sessions. The control group included 21 patients with MCI without any intervention. The Lempel-Ziv complexity (LZC) was used for primary assessment, and WMMSE was used to accurately analyze the effect of NFT. The results show that the WMMSE values of F4, C3, C4, O1, and T5 channels post-NFT are higher compared with pre-NFT and significant differences (P < 0.05). Moreover, the cognitive subscale of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) results shows that the post-NFT score is higher than the pre-NFT in the vast majority of the patients with MCI and significant differences (P < 0.05). When compared with the control group, the WMMSE values of the experimental group increased in each channel. Therefore, the NFT intervention method contributes to brain cognitive functional recovery, and WMMSE can be used as a biomarker to evaluate the state of MCI brain cognitive function.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".