MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3195033571

Voxel-wise estimation of nondisplaceable binding (VND) for PET SV2A synaptic density imaging with 11C-UCB-J

2019· article· en· W3195033571 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Samantha Rossano, Richard E. Carson

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMedical Imaging Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVoxelNuclear medicineRadioligandBinding potentialPositron emission tomographyPopulationIn vivoVolume of distributionMedicineChemistryPharmacokineticsInternal medicineRadiologyBiologyReceptor
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

578 Objectives: For noninvasive quantification of PET images by reference region methods, a region in which the total radioligand uptake is representative of the nondisplaceable (i.e. free + non-specifically bound) volume of distribution (VND) of the radiotracer is used to determine the specific binding of the PET radiotracer to its target, such as the binding potential with respect to the nondisplaceable compartment BPND. VND can be determined in vivo using pairs of baseline and blocking scans using specific pharmaceuticals that compete with the PET tracer at its target. Typically, the occupancy (r) and VND can be estimated from a Lassen Occupancy Plot, in which the difference of volume of distribution VT between baseline and blocking conditions is plotted against the baseline VT. The slope of the best fit line of this data is the estimated occupancy, and the x-intercept represents VND. This analysis requires the assumption that both the occupancy and the nondisplaceable binding are uniform across all brain regions. The objective of this work is to examine the assumption of uniform VND by using a population of baseline and blocking scans to estimate voxel-wise estimates of VND and the specific volume of distribution (VS) using 11C-UCB-J, a PET radioligand that targets the synaptic vesicle glycoprotein-2A (SV2A). Methods: Nine healthy subjects underwent a PET scan with 11C-UCB-J before and after a single dose of the SV2A-specific drug Brivaracetam (BRV). Images were acquired on the High-Resolution Research Tomograph (HRRT) and were reconstructed with OSEM (2 iterations, 30 subsets). Time-activity data and arterial input functions were analyzed using a 1-tissue compartment model. Parametric VT images were created for both baseline and blocking scans and were registered to the Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI) template space. Blood samples were taken at the beginning, middle, and end of the blocking scan to determine drug plasma levels. At each voxel i, using data from baseline and blocking VT images for each subject j, ordinary least squares methods were used to fit the model in Eq. 1 VT,i,j = VND,i + (1-rj) [asterisk] VS,i (Eq. 1) where rj=cj/(cj+IC50) at blocking, where cj is the plasma BRV concentration during each scan (0 for baseline scans) and IC50 is the known BRV concentration at which 50% of SV2A occupancy is reached. Parametric images were created for VND and VS. VND estimates in brain regions were compared to the average extrapolated VND found from the corresponding Lassen Occupancy plots. Results: Across the nine subjects, the average (± SD) Lassen VND was 2.65 (± 0.57) mL/cm3. Using the voxel-wise estimation of VND and VS, the estimated VND was nonuniform within the brain, ranging from an average of 2.81 (± 0.24) ml/cm3 in the gray matter to 3.38 mL/cm3 in the white matter centrum semiovale region (Table 1). On average, the voxel-wise VND estimates in the gray matter regions were consistent with the Lassen VND estimates. VS was also nonuniform, ranging from 1.46 mL/cm3 in the centrum semiovale to an average of 18.2 (± 1.7) mL/cm3 in the gray matter. Conclusions: The current work proposes a voxel-wise method for estimating the VND and VS of SV2A PET radiotracer, 11C-UCB-J using pairs of baseline and blocking scans. With this method, we report variable VND estimates across the brain, which ranged from -6 to +24% different from the average VND from the Lassen Occupancy plot. A non-zero VS estimate in the centrum semiovale, a proposed reference region for 11C-UCB-J, was also observed. Though non-zero VS in the white matter is not ideal, it is a small fraction of what is observed in the gray matter regions (~8%), and may still be useful for reference region quantification methods. The proposed voxel-wise estimation method may also be useful for other PET radiotracers, to validate or explore new reference regions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMedical Imaging Techniques and Applications→French-language works237,207→